Erigo Kreatif Innovations × RevSculpt, Outbound Strategy

Why the work is not what is holding this back

You are already vetted by the platform your buyers are choosing. What you do not have is a way to reach those buyers before they go looking, and no way to see the ones who already came.

What you already haveA credential most studios cannot get

Listed on Framer Experts as a Studio, positioned United States, Austin, working in English and Spanish
Six sites accepted into Framer's public gallery: Prodred, Dilersan Holding, Minist AI, Bunkasai, Avrasya Decoration and Anatolia Tower
Products on the Framer Marketplace, including the Minist template and a Hover Animation component
Tarik was selected as one of the Top Web Designers for the Framer 3.0 launch event
Twenty seven published projects, twenty one of which include a website
Two arms in one team: Kreatif for brand, design and media, Innovations for software, enterprise apps and LLM work

Every line here is from erigokreatif.com and framer.com/@erigo, read on 31 July 2026.

Where the demand sitsThe platform stopped being a bet

Framer raised 100 million dollars at a 2 billion dollar valuation in August 2025
An audit of the source code of all 200 YC W26 company websites found 27 running Framer in production, third behind Next.js and ahead of WordPress, Wix and SvelteKit combined
Framer's agency programme pays up to 50 percent commission on referrals, so a company you bring onto the platform carries a second revenue line beside the project fee
Every company in that population already chose your platform. None of them need convincing about the tool, only about who should drive it

Sources: framer.com/blog/series-d and Bloomberg for the round. The YC count is Harsha Gaddipati's published source-code audit of the W26 batch, 4 April 2026. We are not using the widely repeated "40 percent of the batch" figure, because it has no primary source and is roughly three times the audited count.

What is missingNothing is measured and nothing routes

erigokreatif.com loads Framer's own event script, the site bundle, and a Cal.com embed on the contact page. That is the entire stack
No analytics of any kind, no CRM, no visitor identification, no chat, no marketing automation
Your contact form asks every visitor for a budget band, from under 1,000 dollars to over 50,000. Nothing routes on the answer. It lands in a shared inbox
Your Framer profile says Austin. Your portfolio is Istanbul. Nothing bridges those two except outbound

Checked by reading the raw HTML on 31 July 2026 and testing for every common analytics, CRM, pixel and chat fingerprint. Zero hits.

One thing worth fixing in week one. Your portfolio is your sales asset, and right now every person who reads it is anonymous. Traffic arrives from Behance, Dribbble, the Framer gallery and the Experts directory, and you cannot name a single company that came. You also cannot tell which project page they read, which is the thing that tells you what they want to buy. That is not a website project. It is the minimum needed to know whether any of this is working, and it is the difference between a portfolio and a pipeline.

Who actually has to say yes

You sell two different things to two different people. A website and brand rebuild is bought by marketing. A UI/UX audit and product UX work is bought by product. Mixing them is how good outreach lands on the wrong desk.

Segment	Why they matter to Erigo
Funded startups, seed to Series B	New money, a mandate to look credible, and a founder who knows the current site was a placeholder. The clearest budget event there is
Scale-ups with a new marketing leader	A new Head of Marketing rebuilds the site inside their first ninety days. They are looking for a studio in week two, not week twenty
Companies already running Framer	Past the platform argument entirely. They chose the tool and built it themselves or bought a template. They need a studio, and Framer already vouches for you
SaaS with a dated product interface	Their own paying customers say so in public, in review dislike fields. This is the UI/UX Audit and Product UX line, not a website rebuild, and it goes to product not marketing
Consumer and ecommerce brands with a slow or broken site	Trustpilot and app store reviews name the problem directly: slow, confusing checkout, broken on mobile. That points at the web experience
Accelerator batches and VC portfolios	A new cohort every six months, every one of them needing a site fast. One signed platform relationship is a recurring pipe rather than a single project
Companies hiring a designer and failing to fill it	A req open past forty five days means the work is needed now and hiring did not solve it. You can name the role in the first line
Agencies and consultancies without Framer capability	They win the client, then need someone who can actually build it. A white-label channel, not competition

The people we write toBy title, never by inbox

Founder and CEO, at anything pre Series A, where they are still the whole decision
Head of Marketing, VP Marketing, CMO, for the website and brand line
Head of Brand, Brand Director, Head of Growth
Head of Product, CPO, Head of Design, for the audit and product UX line
At agencies: Partner, Delivery Lead, Head of Production
At funds and accelerators: Platform Director, Head of Portfolio Services

Built person by person with a verified work email. No info@ addresses, which is exactly the address your own site publishes and exactly why it does not work in reverse.

Two offers, never mixedThe split decides the sequence

Website and brand. Triggered by funding, a new marketing leader, a bad marketing site, or a Framer build that needs a studio. Goes to marketing
UI/UX audit and product UX. Triggered by customers complaining about the product interface in reviews. Goes to product. You already sell this as a product: the D'S Damat engagement was exactly a UI/UX Audit
Different trigger, different buyer, different opening line, different case study attached
Running them as one campaign is the fastest way to make both look generic

The signals we track

Thirteen signals across four engines. Each one answers the same question in a different way: what happened this week that makes a studio worth calling right now.

Engine 01

Net-new, sourced by fit and timing

Companies that have never heard from you, picked because something about them changed or because they were always the right shape.

#	Signal	What fires it	Where the data comes from
01	Already running Framer, built badly	Their live HTML carries the Framer fingerprint, and the build scores as template-grade rather than studio-grade	`PublicWWW`, `BuiltWith`, `Firecrawl`
02	Raised in the last 90 days	A new round announced. Overlaid on signal 01 this produces the hottest slice in the whole stack: funded, and already on your platform	`Exa`, `Crunchbase`
03	New marketing leader in the seat	A Head of Marketing, VP Marketing, CMO or Head of Brand starts. The site rebuild happens in their first ninety days	`PredictLeads`, `Sales Navigator`
04	Designer role open past 45 days	A web, brand or product designer req that will not fill. The work is needed now and hiring did not solve it	`TheirStack`, `PredictLeads`
05	Site scored and failing	A scoring agent we build for you renders the site at desktop and mobile, scores it against your rubric, and pulls Google's own field performance data. Output is a score and three named faults with screenshots	Custom `Claude Code` skill, `Playwright`, `CrUX API`
06	Accelerator batches and VC portfolios	A new cohort lands, or a fund publishes a portfolio page. Twenty seven of the 200 YC W26 companies run Framer in production	YC directory, fund portfolio pages, `Exa`

Engine 02

Declared pain, and the demand you already have

Somebody said the quiet part in public, or somebody landed on your site and left without a name. Both are demand that already exists.

#	Signal	What fires it	Where the data comes from
07	Social listening on LinkedIn, X and Reddit	Somebody posts asking for a Framer developer, a rebrand, or a studio recommendation. They declared the intent themselves, in writing, unprompted	`Exa` with forced recency, `Firecrawl`, Reddit API, `n8n` on a schedule
08	Reviews naming a slow site or bad UI/UX	A dislike field on G2, Capterra or TrustRadius, or a Trustpilot or app store review, complaining about the interface, the speed, the mobile experience or the navigation	`Firecrawl`, `Exa`
09	Website visitor de-anonymization	A company reads your portfolio and never fills in the form. Today that visit leaves no trace at all	`RB2B` or `Vector` pixel
10	Budget band and speed to lead	Your form already asks for the budget. A 20,000 dollar plus answer routes to Tarik in minutes with the company enriched. A sub 1,000 dollar answer routes somewhere that is not a call	Form webhook, `n8n`, CRM
11	CRM reactivation	Twenty seven past clients, plus every quote that went quiet. The cheapest pipeline in the system, and it starts by building the CRM, because there is not one	CRM build, then sequence

Engine 03

Borrowed audiences

Other people have already gathered your buyers in one place. The work is separating the buyers from the peers.

#	Signal	What fires it	Where the data comes from
12	Competitor audiences, scored against your ICP	The Framer Experts directory is itself the competitor set: a public list of the studios chasing your buyer. We pull their audiences, enrich every profile, and score against your ICP. The scoring is the whole value, because a design studio's following is mostly other designers	Framer Experts directory, audience extraction, `Clay`, `Apollo`
13	Dribbble and Behance engagement	Somebody saved, liked or commented on your work. Warm rather than hot, and distinct from signal 07: this is a reaction to you, not a request for help	Portfolio platform scraping, `Clay`

Engine 04

Connective tissue

The part nobody photographs, and the part that decides whether the other three engines produce meetings or noise.

Enrichment and deliveryHow a signal becomes a conversation

Waterfall enrichment to a named decision maker with a verified work email, never a shared inbox
Email and LinkedIn running as one sequence rather than two disconnected campaigns
Copy in English and Spanish, matching the languages your Framer profile already advertises
Every reply routed to a person and logged, with a stated response time rather than an intention
Deliverability monitored continuously: SPF, DKIM, DMARC, blacklist checks and warmup before a single send

Limits, stated up frontWhat these signals cannot do

Signal 05 is a judgment, not a measurement. Only the performance half is measured. The design score encodes your taste, which means it needs a calibration pass with you before it runs, or the outreach argues from the wrong standard and a designer spots it in one line
Signal 07 is low volume and fast moving. A public request for a Framer developer collects thirty replies within the hour, so it only works with alerting measured in minutes. Reddit is hostile to visible pitching, so that slice is research for an approach made elsewhere
Signal 08 splits in two. A UI complaint in a G2 review is about the product interface, not the marketing site. Different buyer, different service line. Routed wrong it lands on a CMO who does not own the problem
Signal 12 is partial on LinkedIn. You cannot export another company's follower list, so there we work from post engagement, which is a sample rather than the whole audience. On X, Instagram, Dribbble and Behance the audience is fully available

The systems that run it

Every signal above has a tool behind it. This is the whole stack, named, so you can see exactly what you are buying and what it costs to run.

Layer	System	What it does in this build
Tech-stack detection	`PublicWWW`, `BuiltWith`, `Wappalyzer`	Finds every company running Framer, and every company running something worth replacing
Market and funding intelligence	`Exa`	Funding rounds, launches, news and the recency filter that keeps stale pages out of the list
Site and content intelligence	`Firecrawl`	Reads target sites, review pages and directories at scale. This is what makes signal 08 possible
Hiring and job-change signals	`PredictLeads`, `TheirStack`, `Sales Navigator`	New marketing leaders, unfilled designer reqs, headcount movement
Site scoring	Custom `Claude Code` skill, `Playwright`, `CrUX API`	Renders and scores a target site against your rubric, and pulls Google's own field performance data
Enrichment and waterfall	`Clay`, `Apollo`, `Prospeo`	Turns a company into a named decision maker with a verified work email
Sending and sequencing	`Salesforge` or `EmailBison`, with `Warmforge`	Runs the campaigns, handles warmup, sequencing and follow-up
Deliverability	`Domain Health`	SPF, DKIM, DMARC and blacklist monitoring, continuously rather than at setup
Copy quality gate	`RevSculpt Inbox`	Every email scored twice before it sends: will it reach the inbox, and will a real buyer reply. Both must clear or it does not go out
Visitor identification	`RB2B` or `Vector`	Names the companies reading your portfolio, and which project they read
CRM and routing	`Twenty` or `HubSpot`, plus `n8n`	Where replies land, where the budget band routes, and where the history finally lives

On the scoring agent, since it is the unusual one. We build custom scoring skills, and we ship them publicly, so this is demonstrable rather than a claim. RevSculpt Inbox is a Claude Code skill on GitHub that scores cold email on two axes and rewrites what fails. Your version scores websites instead: feed it a domain, it renders desktop and mobile, applies your rubric, pulls the field performance data, and returns a score plus three named faults with screenshots attached. Those faults are the email. The rubric has to be yours, not ours, which is the first thing we would build together.

The evergreen base underneath all of it

Signals decide the timing. They do not build the audience. Without a base layer already running, every signal email is a cold open from a name nobody recognises.

What it isAlways-on coverage of the whole addressable market

The full list of companies matching your ICP by size, funding stage, vertical and geography, not just the ones a signal fired on this week
Running continuously across email and LinkedIn, in English and Spanish
Segmented by offer, so the website and brand list and the product UX list never receive the same message
Rebuilt and re-verified monthly, because contact data decays and a bounced list burns the domain that carries the signal campaigns

Why it is not optionalIt is what makes the signals land

When a funding round or a new CMO fires, the email lands as a follow-up to someone who has already seen your name, not as a stranger's first contact
Signal volume is inherently small. Signal 07 might produce a handful of genuinely hot conversations a month. That is not a pipeline on its own
The evergreen list is also the pool the signals are matched against, so building it is how the signal layer knows who to watch
Run signals alone and you get a great reply rate on a tiny number of sends, which reads as a good campaign and pays like a bad one

Investment

Three ways to buy it, and the one we would actually recommend. Dollars, because your Framer profile positions the studio in the United States.

Evergreen outreach

The coverage base, running all year.

$5,500/mo

The full addressable list by stage, vertical, size and geography
Always-on outreach across email and LinkedIn
Copy split by offer and by segment, in English and Spanish
Full sending infrastructure: domains, mailboxes, warmup, deliverability monitoring
Monthly reporting on meetings held, not on open rates

Pick this to get coverage running before layering any timing on top.

Signal outreach

The timing layer, built and maintained.

$7,500/mo

The Framer detection sweep and the build-quality scoring on top of it
The custom site-scoring agent, calibrated to your rubric
Funding, new marketing leader and stalled designer req monitors
Social listening across LinkedIn, X and Reddit, alerting in minutes
Review mining for slow sites and bad interfaces, split by buyer
Competitor audiences pulled and scored against your ICP

Pick this once you want the week decided by what changed, rather than by who happened to refer you.

Recommended

Both, as one system

The signals sitting on top of the base.

$10,000/mo

Everything above, run as one machine rather than two campaigns
Website visitor de-anonymization installed on erigokreatif.com, so you finally know who reads the portfolio and which project they read
Inbound enrichment and speed to lead: the budget band on your form routes in minutes, enriched, to the right person
CRM build and hygiene, because there is nothing to keep clean yet
A company contacted cold today gets contacted again the moment it raises, hires a CMO, or turns up in the visitor feed

Bought separately the two programmes are $13,000 a month. Together they are $10,000, and they work better, because the evergreen base is what makes the signal outreach land warm instead of cold.

What we are not going to put on this page. A revenue projection. We would need your average project value, your close rate and your delivery capacity to state a payback honestly, and you have not given us those yet. Your own contact form spans from under 1,000 dollars to over 50,000, which is a twenty times range, so any number we invented here would be arithmetic dressed as a forecast. Bring those three figures to the call and we will state the payback in your numbers instead of a range.

Framer lists you as an Expert. A listing is not a pipeline.

What you already haveA credential most studios cannot get

Where the demand sitsThe platform stopped being a bet

What is missingNothing is measured and nothing routes

The people we write toBy title, never by inbox

Two offers, never mixedThe split decides the sequence

Enrichment and deliveryHow a signal becomes a conversation

Limits, stated up frontWhat these signals cannot do

What it isAlways-on coverage of the whole addressable market

Why it is not optionalIt is what makes the signals land

Thirty minutes, and we score your first ten targets live.